Too much to watch
Thousands of tags, alarms and trends compete for limited engineering attention. Important process drift can develop long before someone has time to investigate it.
Sentinel works alongside operations and engineering teams 24/7—continuously understanding process behaviour, investigating deviations, identifying optimisation opportunities and helping determine what should happen next. Underneath, Veldar combines live plant data with first-principles engineering models so Sentinel can reason about the physical process, not historical patterns alone.
Thousands of tags, alarms and trends compete for limited engineering attention. Important process drift can develop long before someone has time to investigate it.
Engineers often begin analysis after an alarm, production loss or equipment issue appears—when value may already have been lost.
The best operational decisions depend on experienced engineers combining process history, equipment knowledge and first-principles reasoning. That expertise is difficult to apply everywhere, all the time.
Sentinel follows the same loop as a strong process engineer: gather evidence, build context, test explanations, evaluate options and learn from outcomes. Physics and engineering models sit underneath that workflow, giving the AI a grounded understanding of how the process should behave.
SCADA, historians, PLCs, laboratory data, CMMS, edge devices and engineering records.
Relate signals to assets, process streams, operating modes, design intent, constraints and dependencies.
Reconcile data quality, infer hidden physical state and form competing explanations for process behaviour.
Use mass and energy balances, fluid, thermal, mechanical and process-specific models to test what is physically plausible.
Evaluate scenarios and rank actions by expected impact, confidence, risk and operating constraints.
Capture what operators did, what happened next and how future engineering decisions should improve.
Every investigation retains its evidence: observed signals, inferred state, expected physical behaviour, competing causes, uncertainty, recommended action and eventual outcome. Engineers can inspect the case before deciding whether to act.
This is the foundation for trust: not a black-box score, but an auditable engineering judgement.
Sentinel is designed to take on the repetitive investigative work that consumes engineering attention—while keeping people in control of consequential decisions.
Track the process across assets, streams, constraints and operating modes without waiting for an engineer to open a dashboard.
Form and test root-cause hypotheses using plant evidence, engineering context and first-principles behaviour.
Test available actions before they are applied and rank them by expected impact, confidence, constraints and operational risk.
Deliver engineering recommendations into existing workflows with approvals, traceability and clear supporting evidence.
Capture decisions, interventions and outcomes so the engineering context becomes richer with every operating cycle.
As confidence grows, approved actions can move from recommendation to execution within explicit physical, safety and business constraints.
Sentinel begins by working alongside engineers, not replacing control or safety systems. As its engineering judgement is validated against real outcomes, organisations can progressively authorise more actions inside defined operating boundaries.
Unify live signals and engineering context into a common operating picture.
Identify physical causes, deviations and developing process conditions.
Propose actions with evidence, confidence and expected operational effect.
Trigger actions after human approval through existing control and workflow systems.
Continuously act inside validated constraints, with oversight, traceability and override.
Sentinel complements the tools your engineers already use—SCADA, historians, DCS, simulations, maintenance systems and existing analytics. It can begin read-only on one repeatable engineering problem and expand without a rip-and-replace programme.
Select one costly, repeatable engineering problem with available data and a measurable operational outcome.
Connect relevant plant data and map assets, process relationships, design intent and approved operating constraints.
Compare Sentinel’s investigations and recommendations with engineering judgement and actual plant outcomes.
Add engineering tasks, assets, process units and sites while preserving shared context, model knowledge and decision history.
We are working with a small number of continuous-process organisations to validate Sentinel against real engineering work. The strongest starting point is a repeatable problem where your team already has data, but still spends significant engineering time understanding what is happening, why it is happening and what to do next.